Is the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?


Is the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?

Puff Bar is a wonderful alternative to a normal ice cream treat because it has none of Vape Pen the cons associated with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, that makes it a great option to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it is a healthy alternative for individuals who are watching their diet. In addition to that, Puff Bar is easy to make, you can make it as often as you want without needing to prepare the ice cream each time. It’s great for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.

Puff Bar

Puff Bar is a relatively new product, that was developed to test people reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. Whenever we smoke we have been exposing ourselves to thousands of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and in addition has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.

One of the biggest issues in public health today is obesity and diet. Because of this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these brilliant products, they’re currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar declare that people who use their product to lose excess weight can easily do so when they only need to take with you the tiny product. The makers of Puff Bar know that since public health officials have already been calling to find out more on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to learn about Puff Bar and whether or not it poses a risk to public health.

By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they’re in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In line with the FDA any e-cigarette that contains nicotine must contain an insert that allows you to put it into the mouth area, because of this you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to take it where ever you may go. If the product also has an extinguisher additionally it is in violation of regulations. The reason being that while there is no ash produced by a puff Bar e Cigarette it isn’t a valid device to use to refill an existing e cigarette with nicotine or to smoke a different one.

Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the companies that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a way that is illegal. Besides sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request that they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the company’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.

What the legal team did isn’t entirely surprising. The problem with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in regulations. This is because there’s currently no law mandating that electric cigarettes have to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could open up a flood of lawsuits that might be filed by municipalities that wished to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting form of tobacco into the marketplace.

Plus the possibility of a lawsuit being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes out there could result in a decrease in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are presented with non-tobacco flavored e-cigs are more likely to replace those cigarettes with the ones that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to the younger generations, this could substantially decrease the number of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. Also it seems that the addition of the puff bar to several tobacco-flavored electronic cigarettes could lead smokers to seek out “real” cigarettes rather than rely so heavily on an alternative that may not provide them with nicotine.

It seems that the UK government may have a point. There is currently no requirement for tobacco companies to include warning labels on their products nor is there a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The thing that these products all have in common is that they can not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution just like the puff bar would seem like a much better way to make money for tobacco companies because they’re essentially creating products which are more difficult to consume, which in turn implies that fewer people will purchase them.